John McCain and War

John Mc'Cain

Above: Republican Presidential Candidate John McCain (Photo: Charles Dharapak/AP)

Presumptive Republican Presidential candidate John McCain, like his President in Washington, does not want to softly deal with suspected Bin Laden-embracing or nuke-developing countries. For him, talking to possible terrorists is a big waste of time. He even criticizes presumptive Democratic Presidential Candidate Barrack Obama for planning a friendly stance toward those hostile countries.

Barrack Obama

Above: Democratic Presidential Candidate Barrack Obama (Photo: nativenotes.wordpress.com)

Once again, McCain is certain with what he is saying as if Bush’s war strategy yielded positive results – a war that he strongly encouraged and supported. Years after the United States started a war in Afghanistan, al-Qaeda still remains a hot news item and its leader still speaks confidently on camera against America. McCain’s irony does not just end there as the War on Iraq which he favored and still favors, continues to defeat its purpose.

John Mc'Cain

Above: McCain in Iraq (Photo: www.defendamerica.mil)

Obama may have erred in his stance on Afghanistan years ago, but he saw wisdom in voting against the War on Iraq. If he plans to learn from the mistakes that he saw, then such a plan is expected of a man who uses his mind. McCain simply looks beyond what he sees, but the problem is that such “beyond” sights of this veteran senator are clearly unreal. Logic simply dictates us to learn from our past failures. If we listen to McCain and believe that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq which destroyed more innocent lives than 9/11 are not a failure, then this world would be far worse than too much.

Britain Involved in Rendition

Rendition Movie
Above: A scene from the movie “Rendition”

For years, people in the country have been contending the involvement of Britain in “rendition missions” of the United States. Today their fears were confirmed.

Foreign Secretary David Miliband told the House of Commons on Thursday that “contrary to earlier explicit assurances,” the Central Intelligence Agency had attested using the British island of Diego Garcia for refueling two American rendition flights in 2002.

Rendition is a handing over of a person from one jurisdiction to another – a common type of which is extradition where one country requests and obtains from another the surrender of a criminal. After the September 11, 2001 attacks, however, extreme rendition has allegedly been made by the United States (particularly the Central Intelligence Agency) on suspected terrorists. In such cases, it is believed that they transport suspects to countries like Egypt, Syria, and Uzbekistan – where they are “questioned” regarding terrorist attacks that they may or may not be involved with. Laws in these regions regarding questioning approve borderline torture. So in effect, the United States government is not liable for any kind of torture inflicted on their suspects.

The acknowledgment of the rendition flights contradicted previous United States assurances that no such flights had landed on British territory.

Controversial CIA Director General Michael Hayden (who earlier admitted to waterboarding al-Qaeda detainees) informed British officials that a recent review of agency records had shown that the agency committed an error in reporting to Britain previously that “there had been no rendition flights involving their soil or airspace” since the September 11 attacks.

“That information, supplied in good faith, turned out to be wrong,” the Director said. “This time, the examination revealed the two stops in Diego Garcia. The refueling, conducted more than five years ago, lasted just a short time. But it happened.”

“That we found this mistake ourselves, and that we brought it to the attention of the British government, in no way changes or excuses the reality that we were in the wrong. An important part of intelligence work, inherently urgent, complex and uncertain, is to take responsibility for errors and to learn from them. In this case, the result of a flawed records search, we have done so.”

Miliband said he had received a personal apology from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

“It is unfortunate that this was not known, and it was unfortunate it happened without us knowing that it had happened,” said Prime Minister Gordon Brown. He assured that Britain will start installing procedures to ensure that such a breach will not happen again.

Director Hayden said that neither of the two detainees transported in the said rendition flights “was ever part of the CIA’s high-value terrorist interrogation program.”

Bomb Blasts Turkey 4 killed

Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Above: Recep Tayyip Erdogan (left)

Recep Tayyip Erdogan Turkish Prime Minister announced An estimated 4 people have died due to a car bomb explosion in the city of Diyarbakir on Thursday 3rd of January 2008. There is also reports of 52 people injured, six are deemed critical.

Diyarbakir Map Turkey

Above: Diyarbakir Map , car bomb explored in city killing 4

The remote controlled car bomb was detonated as a contingent of the Turkish military passed through a bustling area of the city of Diyarbakir, one soldier is know to be among the injured.

Six cars were burnt beyond recognition a bus was engulfed in flames. The city was attacked before by Kurdish militants when 10 people died from a car bomb in September 12th 2006. It is believed Kurdish militants were behind this car bomb attack.

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE TWIN TOWERS

It is probably one of the most horrendous and heart-wrenching scene ever to be caught on video. No matter how desensitized we may have become because of news on the on-going struggles in Iraq and other events considered to be aftermaths of this scene, watching it unfold once more before our very eyes will never fail to elicit a tear drop from at least some of us.

Who could ever forget the fall of the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers on September 11, 2001? Who would ever forget these scenes of thick smoke coming from the upper levels of the North Tower, of people jumping to their deaths, of a second airplane diving and crashing into the South Tower, of the eventual collapse of these two skyscrapers that have once been landmarks in the New York City skyline?

The collapse of the World Trade Center never fails to strike an emotional note in most of us. Some of us have family members, friends and loved ones who died in that tragedy. Some of us are still coping with the mind-blowing loss that tragedy brought. Many of us, who have not lost anyone precious to them when the Twin Towers fell, are simply bewildered and horrified, with our sense of what is right rattled by the very reality that the Twin Towers has indeed fallen.

Why did the Twin Towers fall? The official account held to by the government of the United States is that 19 terrorists deployed by the al-Qaeda terrorist group have infiltrated United States soil and got into four commercial airplanes on that fateful day, two from United Airlines and two from American Airlines. American Airlines Flight 11 crashed on the North Tower, followed by the United Airlines flight 175 on the South Tower. The other American Airlines aircraft, Flight 77, dived for the Pentagon and caused five floors of the edifice to collapse, while the other United Airlines plane, Flight 93, fell in Pennsylvania, allegedly on its way to Washington, D.C.

That is the official account. However, there are many parties that find this explanation thoroughly unpalatable. Not surprisingly, many conspiracy theories have sprung up, offering alterative scenarios as to what really happened to the Twin Towers. These conspiracy theorists have claimed that al-Qaeda is not to blame for the fall of the World Trade Center, but rather it was an elaborately engineered plan set up by the United States government to win public support in their envisioned War on Terror.

What evidence do these conspiracy theorists have at hand? Many claim that there were intelligence reports submitted to the government relaying of a plan to strike at the World Trade Center months before it actually happened. These reports were purportedly ignored. Another piece of evidence that conspiracy theorists have pointed to is the behavior displayed by President George W. Bush when he found out about the explosions at the World Trade Center. He was too calm, they said, and the calmness is a mark of a supposed fact that he knew about the attack beforehand. Another body of evidence is the pockets of dust and explosions on the body of the Twin Towers below the impact point, suggesting that explosives have been planted beforehand to make these buildings collapse.

Regardless of how colorful conspiracy theories may sound, one cannot deny that most of these theories only use circumstantial evidence at best. Nonetheless, one cannot deny the need for people to come up with conspiracy theories, if only to deal with the loss and horror we all faced on that fateful day dated September 11, 2001.

TRUE ANSWERS TO THE HUNT THE BOEING TEST

The Internet and the media are rife with conspiracy theories on what really happened during the September 11 terrorist attacks. Among the more popular bodies of evidence being bandied about by the conspiracy theorists pointing to a possible cover-up or engineering by the US government has something to do with the amount of damage sustained by the Pentagon during the 9/11 attacks. We will all remember that one of the four planes hijacked by the 19 terrorists supposedly deployed by Al-Qaeda, the American Airlines Flight 77, collided against a face of the Pentagon. It has been the subject of the popular Internet meme called Hunt the Boeing Test. Would you care to know the true answers to the questions in this meme?

1. Question: Can you explain how a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and traveling at a minimum speed of 250 miles an hour only damaged the outside of the Pentagon?

Answer: The initial photographs and images taken right after the collision are misleading, because they do not show the actual extent of the damage to the Pentagon. While these photographs only depict a damaged outside wall with the roof intact, the aircraft was able to penetrate through the wall of the third ring’s ground floor.

2. Question: Can you explain how a Boeing 14.9 yards high and 51.7 yards long, with a wingspan of 41.6 yards and a cockpit 3.8 yards high could crash just into the ground floor of this building?

Answer: The airplane dived so low that the energy needed to create a more extensive damage to the Pentagon has already dissipated upon collision. The point of collision was actually a spot between the first and second floors of the building.

3. Question: You’ll remember that the aircraft only hit the ground floor of the Pentagon’s first ring. Can you find debris of a Boeing 757-200 in this photograph?

Again, the photograph attached is misleading. It had not taken into account the fact that the plane tore through the third ring of the Pentagon at high speed between the first and second floors. There was a huge explosion that happened right after the collision, which melted whatever debris and scrap left from the aircraft.

4. Question: Can you explain why the Defense Secretary deemed it necessary to sand over the lawn, which was otherwise undamaged after the attack?

Answer: This is actually to prevent the trucks hauling the debris away from the damage site from slipping across the grassy lawn of the Pentagon.

5. Question: Can you explained what happened to the wings of the aircraft and why they caused no damage?

Answer: The most plausible explanation is that the wings snapped upon hitting the building’s walls and the debris burned in the following explosion.

6. Question: Can you explain why the County Fire Chief could not tell the reporters where the aircraft was?

Answer: Actually, he did answer the question. The actual question was: “Is there anything left of the aircraft at all,” to which the he replied that the debris were smashed upon impact and burned away at the explosion.

7. Question: Can you find the aircraft’s point of impact?

Answer: The impact point was permanently obscured by the collapsing portions of the Pentagon right after the explosion happened.